In reflecting on the studies I reviewed for my PICOT question, I believe that contemporary researchers generally do an adequate job of protecting the rights of human subjects. Most studies I encountered included comprehensive informed consent processes, where participants were fully informed about the nature of the research, potential risks, and benefits, as well as their rights to withdraw at any time. Additionally, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) provide oversight to ensure that studies comply with ethical standards and federal regulations, such as the Common Rule (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2018).
However, there is always room for improvement. One area where additional measures could be beneficial is in the ongoing monitoring of participants’ well-being throughout the duration of a study. While initial IRB approval and informed consent are critical, continuous oversight could help address any unforeseen issues that may arise. This could include regular check-ins with participants, enhanced adverse event reporting, and increased transparency regarding study progress. Another area for improvement is ensuring that research studies include a diverse range of participants, which would help ensure that the benefits and risks of research are shared equitably across different populations.
References:
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2018). The revised Common Rule. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/finalized-revisions-common-rule/index.html